Back to my coffee

It was just a bit of fun on which MoreBlack plugged in, I thought….
And just a bit reference to the T shirt debate, hehehe

Always jealous of people who have wonderful DP and co rare stuff in their house, grrrrrrrrrrr

Changing your Tune?……

Must be schmoozing up to the Big Boyz here in order to get by the ‘Edit Police’…..

I really detest ’sell outs’…..You didn’t used to be that way…I guess you so strive to be ‘Heard’ that you must make concessions for who you really are….

Oh Well….

Cheers

Priest, it was an A-B conversation, C your way out.lol!

Tracy, I’m sure there are some here who want to see things they’ve never seen before, so that must be who this caters to. I also have the 1hr “Making Of Armenia” narrated by Tommy Vance, so this isn’t all there is to see of this, not to mention the b/w edited version.

Moreblack, you can do a lot better than that!(remember reality?)

Soon after, Purple hired JLT…..(We all know how that went).

JLT Out, Gillan back in…..
Thank the Hard Rock GODS!!!!!

Later on, the Hard Rock GODS continued to weight in and answered yet another HARD ROCK CALLING.

Blackmore Out, Morse In……

The rest is ‘PURPLERY’.

Cheers

Anyway, it was for charity, so….

Great cause though and must have sol well at the time to raise a significant level of dosh!

Brian May and Tony Iommi Metropolis Studio London 1989
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUBFaNVCtBA&

I appreciate that and the link and will study it, in fact I’d like use that link to convey understanding with my associates, so thanks!
However, I don’t think “Prince” and his attorney’s will agree, as he has threatened or might even be undergoing a huge class action suit against Google for Youtube and Google’s use of his image and likeness, and intellectual property allowed to be posted at their locations regardless of disclams. He uses Websharrif as far as I know and those two locations are under investigation by his legal team. I know it’s nothing but a hair splitting subject and should be discussed at a more proper location, but he’s pretty big and has nothing but time for slow due process concerning it. My point is that if one follows Youtube’s detailed guidelines they would not upload such material in the first place, so someone somewhere down the line is responsible.(not that I don’t frequent the site myself and enjoy it) After going over the information in that link, and I’m dead wrong, boy wilI be happy.lol!

Of course it’s important to view as much on the subect as possible, whether it be true or false, in order to have a good understanding about subjects of such concern when disgussing them.

About your photo, just a quick question:
If someone is using it as their signature in forums, is that okay, since the forum subject matter is dedicated to DP?
I ask because associates of mine have/are using it, and if you want me to inform them to stop doing so I will be happy to.

the picture they used for the article is published under Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 license. it says that the picture can be copied, transformed and incorporated into other works freely provided only 2 conditions are satisfied:
1) it’s properly attributed
2) the resulting work must be distributed on similar terms

what that news agency did is put the picture without attribution into their article and slap “all rights reserved” under it. big boo on both counts, particularly on the second one.

in other words, they have violated both the letter and the spirit of creative commons license, which was designed to make using my work easy, not hard.

the video clip here is used within fair dealing (fair use) doctrine of the copyright law. at least the way i understand the canadian version of it. there are six criteria, you can look them up if you’re really interested.